Donald Knuth, Steve Jobs, and How Typography Sucks
watch this video. first 1.6 min.
you see actual movable typefaces and printing with it. extremely idit. then, it began to babble the typical babble about how typeface is a beauty, a design.
Typography, like photography, and grammarians writing style guides, are a foundry of idicy, that rides on art. These are things that have little artistry, but have organized gangs chalking them up to mona lisa.
Donald Knuth, and Steve Jobs, fell for it, and are inspired by it. Typography, like calligraphy, is kinda doodle art. Shallow. Like, a stream isn't a river, but you can't say it's not a body of water, and beautiful.
for sure, monospace isn't eye candy. Note that math in 1980s are all in monospace. and US government publications. So, knuth spent 10 years yak shaving and created TeX , and Steve Jobs made desktop publishing.
when you get into the pants of typography you see heightened souls on foundry houses and designers in all seriousness like pedants deadpan on oxford comma and hacker puffs about indenting style.
well, today i've been thinking, how tremendous bloat is going on with today's font. you know how much computation it takes to render a character on screen? let's go back to bitmapped font. lol. am near my sleep time.
ok. i goto bed. and here's 2 links:
for chinese, non-monospace is easily an eye sore. while western alphabets is most natural when non-monospaced...
i guess the western monospaced font for english alphabets is a byproduct of typewriter engineering... hum might be a interesting subject to look into.
watch this short vid to get a sense of the idicy of typography
btw to unstand the nature of typography and their air, you have to dive into history of printing. in short, half of it is driven by $. half of it is real craftsmanship and ingenuity and engineering. That was, when typography, was art.
If you have a question, put $5 at patreon and message me.