Lisp Needs a Logo
Lisp needs a logo.
Ken Tilton wrote:
Small problem. You forget that Ron Garret wants us to change the name of Common Lisp as the sure-fire way to make it more popular (well, hang on, he says it is necessary, not sufficient. Anyway…) I do not think we can safely pick a new logo until we have our new name.
Changing a language's name is not something that can be easily done, and is unnatural and takes concerted effort, and is very difficult for it to be successful.
However, creating a (universally recognized) logo for the language, is easily done, and in fact the use of a logo or some representative image is inevitable and wide-spread, willy-nilly.
For example, although there are no official logos for lisp, but as you know, there are several logos or images of various forms that are already used widely, either to represent lisp the language family, or to represent the Common Lisp language. And, for various Scheme implementations, they almost all had a logo of their own. (See: The Lambda Logo Tour for Scheme logos) Example:
As these examples attest, that the use of a logo is needed in practice. However, it wouldn't help if there are one hundred different logos to represent the same thing. The point of logos, is to have a memorable, graphical representation. In modern, capitalistic, societies filled with information, the use of logos is inevitable. Just look around you at this very moment, you probably can identify tens of logos: on your computer, on your mouse, on your clothing, on your TV, on your light bulbs, on your watch, phone, bags, shoes. Logo, is merely a graphical representation of a entity, whose textual counterpart is name.
Since there is a need for logos, we might as well get together and agree to have one official logo for lisp the language. That way, it solidifies the purpose of the logos in use.
Note that, although we have the beautiful “lisp lizard” and “alien technology” graphics, but because of their graphic content and in particular the embedded slogan, they do not fit as a logo, but more as web-badges.
Web-badges serve slightly different purpose than logos. It is more for the purpose of promotion, than representation. For the same reason, there are mascots. For example, Java the language, has a official logo of a smoking coffee cup, but also has a mascot of a penguin named “Duke”.
The World Wide Consortium organization (http://www.w3.org/) also has a logo, and it has various web-badges for its various web technology validation services.
The history of Python community's logo is a good example of the eventual recognition of a need for a unified, official logo.
If you have a question, put $5 at patreon and message me.