Programing Language: Syntactic and Semantic Difference of Map Function
In most language today, there's a “map” function, and encouraged by programers as good style. Map is typically used like this:
There's a critical point in the language spec on the behavior of “map”. Namely, whether the language specifies that the function passed to map must not have side-effects.
Array.prototype.map(f). However, the spec says it must be computed as a loop.
[see JS: Array.prototype.map]
Automatic parallel computation advantage of using map is lost.
See: Guy Steele Says: Don't Iterate, Recurse, and Get rid of cons!
In emacs lisp, the spec says the list elements are applied “in turn”.
So, this also means, it thwarts automatic parallel computation.
Consequence of the Map Function Spec
When a language, specifies the map behavior such that:
- the function used in map must have no side-effects.
- and or, the order of the function applying to the list element, is not specified.
Then, such language's “map” function will guarantee automatic parallel computation.
Without the above requirement, the “map” is simply useful as a clean syntax of iteration.
Enforce or Not, and How
If a language specifies that the function passed to map must not have side-effects, then, there is the question of whether the language enforces it. If so, how.
If the language does not enforce it, then, the result can be tricky. Because, programers may just ignore it, or due to ignorance, and use map with function that has side-effect. The result is that, sometimes it may not work, and is hard to debug. Then, it creates a shroud of confusion.
So, the conclusion here is, that even many of today's languages have “map”, but it is merely a trivial advantage of readability or syntactic style. The real fruit, the math properties that propel automatic transparent parallel computation, isn't there.
Then, given the situation, there's the question of whether you should still use “map” (or just go with iteration.).
It is still better to use map. Because, using “map” gives a explicit indication to readers, that the function does not have side-effects, and the order of application to list doesn't matter. In practice, most use of map does follow this.
In GNU Emacs community, I believe there's implicit coding style convention that tell people to use iteration (
dotimes and related) instead of “mapcar”. That's not good.
Programing Language Design
- What's Ontology of Programing Language?
- A Class of Computer Languages: Math Languages
- Why I Hate Exceptions
- Iterator, Enumerator, Abstraction Went Wrong
- Language Design: Should Array Index Start at 0 or 1?
- Syntactic Semantic Difference of Map
- Should Map f Specify Order?
- Function Dependency
- Why I Hate C
- The Complexity of Java Access Specifiers
If you have a question, put $5 at patreon and message me.