Xah Web Dev Blog 2013-08
HTML “q” Tag (updated)
JS: Array.prototype Now, the list of methods is complete, with examples.
CSS Selector Syntax (updated)
HTML: Ruby Tag (updated)
Xah's note extempore #13232, info source of the future
the web is becoming such that sites are dispersed out…
it used to be, there are just few popular sites. For example, for programing, there's slashdot, for open source software, there's soureforge and freshmeat.
today, there are still big sites, such as reddit, hacker news, and the common twitter facebook etc.
however, it seems that, things are getting quite dispersed. often, you get links to a site you never heard of. And some of the sites that was the number one site for a field, but is almost never heard anymore.
i tend to think this is a inevitability. As new sites come in the number of thousands a day, info gets copied, most trying to make money…
my context of this post is that of futurism. That is, what happens to info in a decade or two. For example, will it be from a few sites, or at the opposite extreme where most info you get are from sources you never heard of.
so far, i tend to think it's going to tend to the latter. We'll have a society where info is kinda diverse and incoherent. Kinda like some dystopian dilapidated future in some scifi genre (For example, 12 Monkeys, Blade Runner). You'll have millions of disparate communities.
it's going to be that way, and worse.
in a similar way is gaming communities. For example, you probably never played Second Life. But once you are in for a few months, you realize, there are hundred thousand people in it, and within many different type of communities. They have their own jargons, understanding… quite amazing. Same with say other games such as WarCraft.
so, as a philosopher, or someone who observes society, it's becoming a incredible hard job. This makes sense too, as there are 7 billion people on this earth, and growing, and different countries, cultures. one cannot know, and know relatively less and less of humanity.
this is not surprising actually. Since, for example, if you are American, and never lived in China, India, Arabic countries, you are pretty much ignorant of humanity. Likewise for someone in other country.
and to trace this thought, we have few thousand years of history. Who actually have a basic understanding of it? The language, the culture, the arts, the science, in the past in different regions? that rules out 99.9999% of population. Even professional historian, can only know perhaps less than 0.1% of it.
but the thing is, most of us are not aware of this fact. We go on about our lives, concerned with whatever that's of immediate interest such as current government, smart phones, cars, health. Occasionally reading some link from social network of something from the past and we go wow i learned something today yet never realize that you know shit.
there's superheros with imagined power, such as knowing anyone's thoughts, or knowing everyone's secrets, or vampire that lives thousands of years. And in quite a few scifi. The bottom line of these is knowledge. That's quite interest a topic by itself. For example, from science aspect, is there a limit in our brain to know, the mechanism… then there's philosophy aspect of what will happen if we suddenly know that much? will it change our thinking completely? (and there's the borg of Star Trek, where everyone knows every other's thoughts and entire collective's knowledge. And there's highlander, where you chop off another's head and you immediately obtain all he knows) And also, if say you suddenly know let's just say just Chinese and Spanish and have “read” entirely of these 2 lang's literature in existence, what happens?
there's a lot to say… will stop typing now.
Failure of Firefox and Google Chrome's Web Developer Inspector
If you haven't heard, Firefox just killed the venerable “blink” tag. JWZ's blogging about it [http://www.jwz.org/blog/2013/08/a-light-has-gone-out-on-the-web/ ]
Note that blink also doesn't work in latest Google Chrome.
however, jwz's site still have blink. How did he do it?
After going thru the ordeal, i'll let you do the discovery.
it was CSS, animation using @keyframe. Somehow, both Firefox and Google Chrome's inspector failed to show it.
Moral of the day: browser's inspector cannot be trusted 100%. Back to trusty emacs with raw source code.
How to get random element from a array?
// get random item from list var aa = [1,2,3]; var ii = aa[Math.floor(Math.random() * aa.length)]; console.log(ii);
document.location.protocol === "file:"
Canvas vs SVG (updated)
If you have a question, put $5 at patreon and message me.